i'm engaged. she's married. i've had a crush on her for a while but would never dream of acting on it. after all, I love my fiancee, and this woman's married, and she's a co-worker. i mean, that's not the kind of indecent proposal you can easily back away from if she says no, and even if she says "yes", is that what I really want? i mean, after all, i love my fiancee with all my heart.
she's just so damned cute.
and I found out today that, apparently, she's having not one but two affairs -- at the same time.
i still can't bring myself to seriously consider it, but damn it does raise the temptation level a bit.
Posted by anonymous at February 9, 2006 9:21 AMGet her man! Pork her eyes out! Doggie style, free style, any style. Oh yeah, get her!
Posted by: at February 9, 2006 9:29 AMTemptation is a bitch! How would you feel if your fiance acted on her temptations? By the way, this is the pot trying to give advice to the kettle.
Posted by: at February 9, 2006 9:37 AMEwwww! I've heard of sloppy seconds, but this gal is really getting around! I would think that knowing she's married and having two affairs would be more of a turn-off than a temptation.
You say you love your fiancee with all your heart. I don't think so.
Posted by: at February 9, 2006 2:27 PMDear Commenter Number 3,
Your view of love is overly simplistic if it can't contain the idea of unrequited lust.
Posted by: at February 9, 2006 3:07 PMthat is fucked up how can you have a crush on someone else and love your fiencee too god i hate men like you
Posted by: mrsknoob at February 9, 2006 3:31 PMI say do her...hard....& many times
Posted by: Madame Currie at February 9, 2006 4:29 PMYou're not IN love with your fiance and she's probably not "the one". Sorry buddy! It doesn't mean you don't love her, you probably genuinely do but being in love overcomes lust and temptation.
It wouldn't even enter your mind. In its truest form, love is simple. People who aren't ready for it make excuses and twist love to make it acceptable.
Posted by: at February 9, 2006 6:13 PMCommenter #3 certainly understands the concept of unrequited lust. What commenter #3 does not understand is why that lust is directed toward a ho.
Posted by: commenter #3 at February 10, 2006 5:56 AMIt's easy to understand why the lust is directed at a "ho". He's not talking about falling in love and having a family with her. He thinks of her as a wild fling. An opportunity to have sex with a hot woman with no strings attached. She is obviously sexually uninhibited and that in itself is a turn on.
I personnaly wouldn't do it because I have morals.
Posted by: at February 10, 2006 7:55 AMtry to swing a 4-some
Posted by: at February 11, 2006 8:48 AMYou are being tested. Don't do itt. If you do, plan on having affairs once you get married too. This woman has whomever she chooses and she knows it. It would be a one time screw and why risk it?
Posted by: Bad Idea at March 17, 2007 8:33 AM