Wtf happened--I don't understand. I don't understand me. I don't know what's going on. I never expected this. I never expected this. What am I doing?
Is this--what do you call it--is it love?
I said I loved you before, and I meant something when I said it, but I was never sure wtf it was. I meant it--but I didn't understand it. It's different now, donchaknow?
Donchaknow?
Wtf happened?
Is it love? Why is it so delayed? Four years? Wtf is that? And what happens after? Now I start to be afraid.
Posted by anonymous at July 9, 2006 6:09 PMAre you ranting or do you wish for feedback?
If you want feedback (can't promise it will be useful) we would need more information...
Open up girl!
Maybe you've always meant it when you said it, even when you didn't fully understand it. Love is its own thing, a living breathing ideal embedded in the genetic patterns of all living things. Does it give love more meaning when you say it and understand it, as opposed to saying it because you felt it? Some people think so. Personally, I think understanding allows for appreciation, but it is unnecessary for experience. We knew the world was beautiful before scientists dissected it and quantified the attributes which makes it so. It doesn't take away from the beauty, but it does teach us where that beauty comes from and where it goes. I know now what it means to love. I will never take it for granted again. I think it will be the same for you.
:-)
Posted by: at July 10, 2006 10:39 AMYou shouldn't have licked that first pussy!!!
Posted by: at July 10, 2006 11:09 AM2nd commenter...I like; as for the 3rd commenter where do you get YOUR 'kicks sunshine'?
No don't try to tell me, I am pretty sure I would not want to see it.
It is in the nature of inquiry to dissect and try and figure it all out. Philosophers were doing it long before scientists (albeit rather less physically destructively).
Some who are sensitive enough write a poem or beutiful prose like the 2nd commenter others wrtie a treatise on how to arrive at the same answer using set formulaeic approaches, yet others like the 3rd comment get bogged down in only the physical...
Which is love?
Would you deny the 3rd comment group their experience? Never.
Would you try to control the inquisitiveness of that 1st comment? I would not want that (I made that 1st comment).
There is enough expansiveness in the 2nd comment to allow for both and for more.
Kudos!!
You sound like you've probably hurt somebody. They hoped you ment it when you said it and you did'nt even know what you were saying. Maybe you will be more carefull next time.
KRB
Posted by: at July 10, 2006 3:35 PM4th commentor is an ass licking idiot!!
Posted by: at July 10, 2006 6:30 PMMy point was, just because we don't think we knew what love was in hindsight doesn't mean we weren't in love. It simply means we didn't appreciate what we had when we had it. I know I didn't. lol now that I've said it out loud it feels like rationalization. C'est la vie.
Yeah there are different levels of appreciation and different ways to experience it, and if I implied I felt one way was the "right way" compared to another, I apologize. I did not mean that at all.
:-)
Posted by: at July 10, 2006 7:34 PMI agree that I am an idiot. (I am a man afterall) but since it has not been your ass that my tounge has not been caressing it must be your wish or delusion... so
I think you are so desparate for love and attention that this is the only way you can get it, by trying to get a rise out of me...
What to do with you...Hmmm
You are already doing it to yourself.
It is like magic
FUCK YOU, MAN-BITCH!!!
Posted by: at July 12, 2006 11:22 AMCome here kitty kitty kitty who thinks he is a lion
I am going to make some good Korean chop suey out of you
Muhhhhaaa ahhahhahahahhah