This is strange as I never thought I would be posting. I am the real post deleter. I am the one who started it all. Why I did it was because of the constant profanity laced posts by specifically KodyBear and Indy; this actually being quite irrelevant as I have made my feelings very clear from the start. Now while I'm clearing things up, I am not the one you refer to as "The Crusader OR Mr. FATMouth. Should you continue to believe I am then fine, no since in trying to talk to those that are deaf.
Now, why am I posting? First and foremost I have not deleted any posts since Admin put us on time out. I think we all learned, including me from that little episode. Their were some very well thought out and written comments in that string.
The recent posts that are being deleted are not being deleted by my hand. I stated in my poem that hopefully you all read that I would be watching and I am. I have seen no rules broken. What I have seen is a clean version and a genuinely unique Kody story. I applaud him for that effort. Seriously, thank for cleaning it up! I have also seen Indy posts. I don't honestly know that it was Indy as I am also the one that takes credit for running him off. Yes, he is a dismal individual who literally does not belong here or anywhere. Regardless of that one of his posts were deleted as well, again not by my hand. The bottom line is I am not your post deleter this time. However, I would return should the crap return. That is why I am posting. The crap has not returned and I’m taking the heat for deleting posts. So whoever you are make yourself known in the form of a post and clear me. At least I met the beast on equal footing and stated my cause.
I just wanted everyone to know that. Now commenter’s, before you go off on a feeding frenzy please understand I am not posting to argue as to whether I had the right to delete posts or not. I chose to do what I did and I will chose to do so again if necessary. Yes DragonLady I realize this is Admins site and only admin has the right to make those choices. Unfortunately Admin has never made the right choice yet in the proper moderating of this site. And I have every right to say that. I also have every right to disagree with anyone’s rules or regulations as they do mine.
Just understand I am not the current deleter and I say to whomever you are; I disagree.
OPD
The use of profanity or sexual innuendo is not prohibited in Amin's stated rules of conduct.
Posted by: at October 25, 2006 10:46 AMBut posting this subject matter on the main page is.
Posted by: at October 25, 2006 10:47 AMThe post deleter is a psychopath (pronounced as one word). I am on his trail, finding out HIS personal information for once. I have harvested his IP, and should have his name, address, email, and phone number by tomorrow. Get a taste of your own medicine, asshole.
Posted by: at October 25, 2006 11:28 AMThis rambling belongs in the comment section. I would like to ask you something;
Mr.Post Deleter, why is it you think you can do whatever the fuck you want to here at Anonyblog?
You and people like you is what is wrong with our society. You think that you can cram your conservative ideology down everyone’s throat.
There are no rules here about profanity. So get over yourself. We have the freedom to edit our own posts but I would gladly give up that privilege to see you stopped.
There once was a great blogsite called bitchaboutstuff. It was powered by Movable Type also. The way that the webmaster had it set up you could not manage the web log. All you could do was post and comment. I am sure this website could be set up the same way. With some persuasion, I think Admin would do this, as it would save many headaches from people like you.
Posted by: at October 25, 2006 11:53 AMI appreciate your comments, OPD, and I am glad that you acknowledge the fact that only Admin has the right to determine the content of this site. You absolutely have the right to disagree with Admin's rules, but you do NOT have the right to decide whether Admin makes the "right choice...in the proper moderating of this site." Since Admin makes the rules and owns the site, any decision he makes regarding "proper moderation" of this site is right. No matter what content he allows, it is not up to you to edit and/or delete anything here.
May I remind you that anonyblog is not a democracy; it is 100% owned by Admin and subject to Admin's rules, and one of those rules is no deleting/editing.
Posted by: at October 25, 2006 12:28 PM3rd commenter, I would doubt you have my technical know how. I have been around as long as computers (think Commodores and punch cards) and know them almost intimately well. Throughout my career I have beta tested for such firms as Microsoft, Sun Micro Sytems, Adobe, and Borland Corp. I have done work with Citi Bank, Bank of America, First Bank, and Wells Fargo, to name just a few. No, you do not scare me.
4th commenter, the problem with sites like the one you mentioned is a huge lack of moderation. I am sure that is why it went down. I'll check into it though and let you know as I have close personal friends who know the internets as well as you know the back of your own hand. Sorry but every site needs administration and moderation. I am doing this for a reason that I hold very personally. Ask Indy he will tell you.
5th commenter, I presume you are the DragonLady. I'll answer you by stating this, "since admin refuses to moderate the site and since the control to moderate is available, then I'll take it". Right or wrong is not a relevant argument neither is who owns what and who does not. As I stated above "I am doing this for a reason that I hold very personally". Again I have not deleted any posts since the time out. Perhaps everyone should go back and re-read that string.
I'll keep my thoughts and comments limited to the comment section from now on. You may call me OPD!
OPD you are full of shit.
where does state in the rules "since admin refuses to moderate the site and since the control to moderate is available, then..... someone other than Admin needs to do it?". I think you do the shit just to get responses.
Okay, then, OPD: you own your house, and I might not like what your visitors do when they come to see you. By your logic, I have the right to come into your house and throw those visitors out. I have the right to harass them, investigate them, gag them, and threaten them. What they do doesn't have to be against the rules of your house for me to do any of this; I merely have to feel personally that what they're doing is wrong.
Do you still think that right or wrong, or who owns what, is irrelevant now?
Posted by: at October 25, 2006 3:49 PMOK fair question. I will answer it. First though let me reiterate my position. I have not deleted any posts since the time out period. In other words I am not currently deleting any posts, someone else has though. I do not know who they are.
Now to answer your question, allow me to use your analogy. I invite you to my house and you don’t like what my visitors are saying or doing in my house. Specifically you don’t like what my visitors are saying or doing in my house to my wife. Yes, I would allow you to warn them and then kick them out. But we are not talking about your house or mine. The house is Admins and his rules say specifically (prior to time out) this:
Here are the things I won't allow:
1) Images that are unsuitable for children. No nudity, disturbing, or other wise inappropriate for young kids.
2) Commercial posts for products or services
3) Don't change the posts of others
4) Don't mess up the MT configuration or profile
Where does it say “please don’t be courteous” or “please fill the site with inappropriate sexual innuendo” or “please be vulgar and use profanity freely” or “please create fictitious stories about bears performing sodomy on toy monkeys” or “Allow sexual predators (Indy) to post fecal smeared woman and talk about girls eating their own fecal matter”.
Allow me to remind you of sentence #2 of rule #1 “No nudity, disturbing, or other wise inappropriate for young kids” No, that means none. So no, the ones I deleted were not adhering to that rule. The fact that the tools are made available to me or anyone else simply suffices as nothing more than an invitation to do what Admin does not do, administer.
Rule #1 refers to images (pictures). Not the images that you conjure up in your head when you read a post, dumbass.
Posted by: at October 25, 2006 4:56 PMSorry last commenter, the rule is quite specific. Rather than being rude and immediatley hurling insults perhaps you could re-read my last comment. This time read slow so you don't miss something and perhaps ask someone for help with the big words. Once you have done that post again. And it's OPD.
Posted by: at October 25, 2006 5:16 PMCommenter #4, here is the information about your site you mentioned "bitchaboutstuff.com". This was taken down quite some time ago and the URL sponsorship expired on October 7th of this year. Apparently the site owner had COPA issues which I believe this site may also eventually run into. COPA is the "Child Online Protection Act" which protects minors from the commercial distribution of material harmful to minors. That wonderfull image Mr. Indy posted is a good example of a direct violation of COPA. Now you maybe thinking that anonyblog is not commercial however, the image was. Thanks again to Mr Indy!
Posted by: at October 25, 2006 6:25 PMCommenter #4, Heres some more info about the "bitchaboutstuff.com" site. The site was origianlly owned by a Mr. Gavin Estey. He took it down and was due to COPA violations caused by none other than....Yes thats right our own Mr. Indy once again. A very productive night it was as I talked with old colleagues nd discovered some very scary thing about both Mr. Indy and KodyBear. They both were present at "bitchaboutstuff.com" and contributed substantially to its demise. Mr. Indy and Mr KodyBear, are you palnning on taking anonyblog down that road? I don't think Admin would want to go.
Posted by: at October 25, 2006 8:46 PMyo OPD...again you are full of shit... where in the rules does it say: “please be courteous” or “please DO NOT fill the site with inappropriate sexual innuendo” or “please DO NOT be vulgar and use profanity freely” or “please YOU CAN NOT create fictitious stories about bears performing sodomy on toy monkeys”?....OH I didn't think you could find that....again... where does state in the rules "since admin refuses to moderate the site and since the control to moderate is available, then..... someone other than Admin needs to do it?". I think you do the shit just to get responses.
Rule #3: Don't change the posts of others.
I would think that includes deletion, as that is the ultimate "change" one can make to a post. I do believe that Admin has specifically requested that no one delete posts in addition to the rules you allude to. I believe that he has also stated that he alone is responsible for what remains on this site. Go ahead; research the archives, I'll wait.
Anonyblog is not a democracy. It is owned by Admin, who is the president, judge, lawmaker and chief of police for this site. That makes it his house, state, country, whatever. Just because the tools are available to you to "moderate" this site doesn't mean that it is your right to do so. By that logic, if someone harms a member of my family, I have the right to use the tools available to me (in this case, my gun and my knives) to "moderate" the offender. You would have the right to hack into anyone's bank accounts and bleed them dry because the tools are available for you to do so. Post office employees could use the tools available to them (a steaming teakettle) to steam open our mail and read it, or take any money and checks enclosed. Our government can use the tools available to them to listen to every phone call we make. Torture would be permissible on traffic offenders, because the tools of torture are available. Rape would be legal because every man has the necessary "tool" to commit that act.
Are my examples extreme? Yes, certainly. But it starts somewhere, doesn't it? Apparently, it starts with the OPD.
Posted by: at October 26, 2006 4:43 AMWow, give the OPD a break. I think what he is saying is he has as much of a right to use the available tools as any of us do. I don't think he really wants to argue about what is right or wrong.
I also think that he certainly didn't hurt anyone by deleting posts. Especially the clan and Indy posts he deleted. Kind of like taking out the garbage if you ask me.
OPD and LC You are not alone in your perception and stance.
Kudos from at least one other person... Moi!!!
"Wow, give the OPD a break. I think what he is saying is he has as much of a right to use the available tools as any of us do."
Which is, no right at all. Availability does not imply invitation.
Posted by: at October 26, 2006 3:33 PMLC
Too true, and because the site is available for the stuff kb and the like feel free to post here does not mean they are invited... as was the whole point of near every post and comment being filled with go away comments to the kb poster and its like.
I'm sure that if Admin were asked about the tools "available" to edit and delete posts, he would inform you that they are for people to edit and/or delete their own posts, not the posts of others. Furthermore, an open anonymous blog IS an invitation to post whatever you want within Admin's rules.
Posted by: at October 27, 2006 4:43 AMnot when others on the same site are asking you nicely or not to stop.
Posted by: at October 27, 2006 11:01 AMFucktard commenter #21, it does not matter if you ask someone to stop posting. No one has to listen to your request. Get it? Your desire does not matter. No one cares. Get it? You can go around and around with the same argument and it still will not matter. Get it yet? If the Admin does not want something posted on HIS site, HE will remove it. Get it now? No you do not get it, do you? You are much too stupid to understand something as simple as the rules for posting here at Anonyblog. Just give it up and post about something, anything that matters.
Posted by: at October 27, 2006 3:21 PMLC
I have and it has been removed
I have and it has been tampered with
And they were just political stuff, nothing near as bad or as senseless as what I have seen since.
I did not make comments about your intelligence so kindly behave accordingly towards me.
In any social situation the correct approach is one of polite approach first, only after it has been ignored and only then you can progressively get more aggressive.